Therapeutic metallic ions in bone tissue engineering: A systematic review of the literature

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, Dental school, Shahid Beheshti university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

An important field of bone tissue engineering (BTE) concerns the design and fabrication of smart scaffolds capable of inducing cellular interactions and differentiation of osteo-progenitor cells. One of these additives that has gained growing attention is metallic ions as therapeutic agents (MITAs). The specific biological advantage that these ions bring to scaffolds as well as other potential mechanical, and antimicrobial enhancements may vary depending on the ion entity, fabrication method, and biomaterials used. Therefore, this article provides an overview on current status of in-vivo application of MITAs in BTE and the remaining challenges in the field. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Science direct and Cochrane library were searched for studies on MITAs treatments for BTE. We searched for articles in English from January-2000 to October-2019. Abstracts, letters, conference papers and reviews, In-vitro studies, studies on alloys and studies investigating effects other than enhancement of new bone formation (NBF) were excluded. A detailed summary of relevant metallic ions with specific scaffold material and design, cell type, animal model and defect type, implantation period, measured parameters and obtained qualitative and quantitative results is presented. No ideal material or fabrication method suited to deliver MITAs can yet be agreed upon, but an investigation into various systems and their drawbacks or potential advantages can lead the future research. A tendency to enhance NBF with MITAs can be observed in the studies. However, this needs to be validated with further studies comparing various ions with each other in the same animal model using critical-sized defects.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Scheller EL, Krebsbach PH and Kohn DH. Tissue
engineering: state of the art in oral rehabilitation. J.
Oral Rehabil. (2009) 36: 368-89.
2. Motamedian SR, Hosseinpour S, Ahsaie MG
and Khojasteh A. Smart scaffolds in bone tissue
engineering: A systematic review of literature.
World J. Stem Cells (2015) 7: 657.
3. Mourino V, Cattalini JP and Boccaccini AR.
Metallic ions as therapeutic agents in tissue
engineering scaffolds: an overview of their
biological applications and strategies for new
developments. J. R. Soc. Interface (2012) 9: 401-
19.
4. Bostancioglu RB, Gurbuz M, Akyurekli AG,
Dogan A, Koparal AS and Koparal AT. Adhesion
profile and differentiation capacity of human
adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells
grown on metal ion (Zn, Ag and Cu) doped
hydroxyapatite nano-coated surfaces. Colloids
Surf. B Biointerfaces (2017) 155: 415-28.
5. Sánchez AHM, Omidi M, Wurlitzer M, Fuh
MM, Feyerabend F, Schlüter H, WillumeitRömer R and Luthringer B. Proteome analysis
of human mesenchymal stem cells undergoing
chondrogenesis when exposed to the products of
various magnesium-based materials degradation.
Bioactive Materials (2019) 4: 168-88.
6. Prashanth L, Kattapagari K, Chitturi R, Baddam V
and Prasad L. A review on role of essential trace
elements in health and disease. J. NTR Univ. Health
Sci. (2015) 4: 75-85.
7. Qiao W, Liu R, Li Z, Luo X, Huang B, Liu Q, Chen
Z, Tsoi J, Su Y, Cheung, Matinlinna J, Yeung K
and Chen Z. Contribution of the in situ release of
endogenous cations from xenograft bone driven
by fluoride incorporation toward enhanced bone
regeneration. Biomater Sci. (2018) 6: 2951-64.
8. Li D, Huifang L, Zhao J, Yang Z, Xie X, Wei Z, Li D
and Kang P. Porous lithium-doped hydroxyapatite
scaffold seeded with hypoxia-preconditioned bonemarrow mesenchymal stem cells for bone-tissue
regeneration. Biomed. Mater. (2018) 13: 055002.
9. Yuan Z, Wei P, Huang Y, Zhang W, Chen F, Zhang
X, Mao J, Chen D, Cai Q and Yang X. Injectable
PLGA microspheres with tunable magnesium ion
release for promoting bone regeneration. Acta
Biomater. (2019) 85: 294-309.
10. Wang Y, Cui W, Chou J, Wen S, Sun Y and Zhang H.
Electrospun nanosilicates-based organic/inorganic
nanofibers for potential bone tissue engineering.
Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces (2018) 172: 90-7.
11. Zhang Q, Chen X, Geng S, Wei L, Miron RJ,
Zhao Y and Zhang Y. Nanogel-based scaffolds
fabricated for bone regeneration with mesoporous
bioactive glass and strontium: In-vitro and In-vivo
characterization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A (2017)
105: 1175-83.
12. Yu W, Sun TW, Qi C, Ding Z, Zhao H, Chen F,
Chen D, Zhu Y, Shi Z and He Y. StrontiumDoped Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Porous
Microspheres Synthesized through a MicrowaveHydrothermal Method Using Fructose
1,6-Bisphosphate as an Organic Phosphorus
Source: Application in Drug Delivery and
Enhanced Bone Regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces (2017) 9: 3306-17.
13. Liu YJ, Su WT and Chen PH. Magnesium and zinc
borate enhance osteoblastic differentiation of stem
cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth Invitro. J Biomater. Appl. (2018) 32: 765-74.
14. Drynda A, Drynda S, Kekow J, Lohmann CH
and Bertrand J. Differential Effect of Cobalt and
Chromium Ions as Well as CoCr Particles on the
Expression of Osteogenic Markers and Osteoblast
Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. (2018) 19: 3034
15. Wang H, Zhao S, Zhou J, Shen Y, Huang W, Zhang
C, Rahaman M and Wang D. Evaluation of borate
bioactive glass scaffolds as a controlled delivery
system for copper ions in stimulating osteogenesis
and angiogenesis in bone healing. J. Mater. Chem.
B (2014) 2: 8547-57.
16. Saini RK, Bagri LP and Bajpai A. Nano-silver
hydroxyapatite based antibacterial 3D scaffolds
of gelatin/alginate/poly (vinyl alcohol) for bone
tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surf. B
Biointerfaces. (2019) 177: 211-8.
17. Goudouri OM, Kontonasaki E, Lohbauer U and
Boccaccini AR. Antibacterial properties of metal
and metalloid ions in chronic periodontitis and
peri-implantitis therapy. Acta Biomater. (2014) 10:
3795-810.
18. Park JS, Suryaprakash S, Lao Y-H and Leong
KW. Engineering mesenchymal stem cells for
regenerative medicine and drug delivery. Methods
(2015) 84: 3-16.
19. Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, Cavallo C, Desando
G, Bartolotti I and Grigolo B. Scaffolds for Bone
Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new
perspectives. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. (2017) 78:
1246-62.
115
Therapeutic metallic ions
20. Hu C, Ashok D, Nisbet DR and Gautam V.
Bioinspired surface modification of orthopedic
implants for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials
(2019) 219: 119366.
21. Tripathi A, Saravanan S, Pattnaik S, Moorthi A,
Partridge NC and Selvamurugan N. Bio-composite
scaffolds containing chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite/
nano-copper–zinc for bone tissue engineering. Int.
J. Biol. Macromol. (2012) 50: 294-9.
22. Samanta SK, Devi KB, Das P, Mukherjee P,
Chanda A, Roy M and Nandi S. Metallic ion doped
tri-calcium phosphate ceramics: Effect of dynamic
loading on in vivo bone regeneration. J. Mech.
Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2019) 96: 227-35.
23. O’Neill E, Awale G, Daneshmandi L, Umerah
O and Lo KWH. The roles of ions on bone
regeneration. Drug Discov. Today (2018) 23: 879-
90.
24. Sansone V, Pagani D and Melato M. The effects on
bone cells of metal ions released from orthopaedic
implants. A review. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone
Metab. (2013) 10: 34-40.
25. De Jong WH, De Rijk E, Bonetto A, Wohlleben
W, Stone V, Brunelli A, Badetti E, Marcomini A,
Gosens I and Cassee F. Toxicity of copper oxide
and basic copper carbonate nanoparticles after
short-term oral exposure in rats. Nanotoxicology
(2019) 13: 50-72.
26. Apaza-Bedoya K, Bijukumar D, Benfatti CAM,
Mathew MT, da Silva JSP and Souza JCM.
Chapter 4 - Adverse local and systemic effect
of nanoparticles released from oral and craniomaxillofacial implants. In: Souza JCM, Hotza D,
Henriques B, Boccaccini AR. (eds). Nanostructured
Biomaterials for Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral
Applications: Elsevier (2018) 63-79.
27. Wu C, Zhou Y, Fan W, Han P, Chang J, Yuen
J, Zhang M and Xiao Y. Hypoxia-mimicking
mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with
controllable cobalt ion release for bone tissue
engineering. Biomaterials (2012) 33: 2076-85.
28. Fielding G and Bose S. SiO2 and ZnO dopants in
three-dimensionally printed tricalcium phosphate
bone tissue engineering scaffolds enhance
osteogenesis and angiogenesis In-vivo. Acta
Biomater. (2013) 9: 9137-48.
29. Forero JC, Roa E, Reyes JG, Acevedo C and
Osses N. Development of Useful Biomaterial for
Bone Tissue Engineering by Incorporating NanoCopper-Zinc Alloy (nCuZn) in Chitosan/Gelatin/
Nano-Hydroxyapatite (Ch/G/nHAp) Scaffold.
Materials (Basel). (2017) 10: 1177
30. Brown A, Zaky S, Ray H, Jr. and Sfeir C. Porous
magnesium/PLGA composite scaffolds for
enhanced bone regeneration following tooth
extraction. Acta Biomater. (2015) 11: 543-53.
31. Fernandes JS, Gentile P, Martins M, Neves NM,
Miller C, Crawford A, Pires R, Hatton P and Reis
R. Reinforcement of poly-l-lactic acid electrospun
membranes with strontium borosilicate bioactive
glasses for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater.
(2016) 44: 168-77.
32. Newby PJ, El-Gendy R, Kirkham J, Yang XB,
Thompson ID and Boccaccini AR. Ag-doped 45S5
Bioglass(R)-based bone scaffolds by molten salt
ion exchange: processing and characterisation. J.
Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. (2011) 22: 557-69.
33. Tsai KY, Lin HY, Chen YW, Lin CY, Hsu TT and
Kao CT. Laser Sintered Magnesium-Calcium
Silicate/Poly-epsilon-Caprolactone Scaffold for
Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials (Basel).
(2017) 10: 65.
34. Mouriño V, Vidotto R, Cattalini J and Boccaccini
A. Enhancing biological activity of bioactive glass
scaffolds by inorganic ion delivery for bone tissue
engineering. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. (2019).
35. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J and Altman DG.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J.
Clin. Epidemiol. (2009) 62: 1006-12.
36. Liu D, Nie W, Li D, Wang W, Zheng L, Zhang
J, Zhang J, Peng Ch, Mo X and He Ch. 3D
printed PCL/SrHA scaffold for enhanced bone
regeneration. Chem. Eng. (2019) 362: 269-79.
37. Prabha RD, Nair BP, Ditzel N, Kjems J, Nair
PD and Kassem M. Strontium functionalized
scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mat. Sci. Eng.
C-Mater. (2019) 94: 509-15.
38. Lino AB, McCarthy AD and Fernandez JM.
Evaluation of Strontium-Containing PCL-PDIPF
Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: In-vitro
and In-vivo Studies. Ann. Biomed. Eng. (2019) 47:
902-12.
39. Han X, Zhou X, Qiu K, Feng W, Mo H, Wang
M, Wang J and He C. Strontium-incorporated
mineralized PLLA nanofibrous membranes for
promoting bone defect repair. Colloids surf. B.
Biomaterials (2019) 179: 363-73.
40. Yan S, Xia P, Xu S, Zhang K, Li G, Cui L and Yin
J. Nanocomposite Porous Microcarriers Based on
Strontium-Substituted HA- g-Poly(gamma-benzyll-glutamate) for Bone Tissue Engineering. ACS
Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2018) 10: 16270-81.
41. Ge M, Ge K, Gao F, Yan W, Liu H, Xue L, Jin
Y, Ma H and Zhang J. Biomimetic mineralized
strontium-doped hydroxyapatite on porous poly(llactic acid) scaffolds for bone defect repair. Int. J.
Nanomedicine (2018) 13: 1707-21.
116
Safiaghdam H et al. / IJPR (2019), 18 (Special Issue): 101-118
42. Gao L, Huang Z, Yan S, Zhang K, Xu S, Li G, Cui
L and Yin J. Sr-HA-graft-Poly(gamma-benzyll-glutamate) Nanocomposite Microcarriers:
Controllable Sr(2+) Release for Accelerating
Osteogenenisis and Bony Nonunion Repair.
Biomacromolecules (2017) 18: 3742-52.
43. Wang X, Gu Z, Jiang B, Li L and Yu X. Surface
modification of strontium-doped porous bioactive
ceramic scaffolds via poly(DOPA) coating and
immobilizing silk fibroin for excellent angiogenic
and osteogenic properties. Biomater. Sci. (2016) 4:
678-88.
44. Xie H, Wang J, Li C, Gu Z, Chen Q and Li
L. Application of strontium doped calcium
polyphosphate bioceramic as scaffolds for bone
tissue engineering. Ceram. Int. (2013) 39: 8945-54.
45. Gu Z, Zhang X, Li L, Wang Q, Yu X and Feng
T. Acceleration of segmental bone regeneration
in a rabbit model by strontium-doped calcium
polyphosphate scaffold through stimulating VEGF
and bFGF secretion from osteoblasts. Mat. Sci.
Eng. C-Mater. (2013) 33: 274-81.
46. Yang F, Yang D, Tu J, Zheng Q, Cai L and Wang
L. Strontium enhances osteogenic differentiation
of mesenchymal stem cells and In-vivo bone
formation by activating Wnt/catenin signaling.
Stem Cells. (2011) 29: 981-91.
47. Li Y, Li Q, Zhu S, Luo E, Li J, Feng G, Liao Y and Hu
J. The effect of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite
coating on implant fixation in ovariectomized rats.
Biomaterials (2010) 31: 9006-14.
48. Suryavanshi A, Khanna K, Sindhu K, Bellare J
and Srivastava R. Magnesium oxide nanoparticleloaded polycaprolactone composite electrospun
fiber scaffolds for bone–soft tissue engineering
applications: In-vitro and In-vivo evaluation.
Biomed. Mater. (2017) 12: 055011.
49. Deng L, Li D, Yang Z, Xie X and Kang P. Repair of
the calvarial defect in goat model using magnesiumdoped porous hydroxyapatite combined with
recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
Biomed. Mater. Eng. (2017) 28: 361-77.
50. Laurenti M, Al Subaie A, Abdallah MN, Cortes AR,
Ackerman JL, Vali H, Basu K, Zhang Y, Murshed
M, Strandman S, Zhu J, Makhoul N, Barralet J
and Tamimi F. Two-Dimensional Magnesium
Phosphate Nanosheets Form Highly Thixotropic
Gels That Up-Regulate Bone Formation. Nano
Lett. (2016) 16: 4779-87.
51. Wong HM, Chu PK, Leung FKL, Cheung
KMC, Luk KDK and Yeung KWK. Engineered
polycaprolactone–magnesium hybrid biodegradable
porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Prog.
Nat. Sci-Mater. (2014) 24: 561-7.
52. Yu W, Sun TW, Qi C, Ding Z, Zhao H, Zhao S, Shi
Z, Zhu Y, Chen D and He Y. Evaluation of zincdoped mesoporous hydroxyapatite microspheres
for the construction of a novel biomimetic
scaffold optimized for bone augmentation. Int. J.
Nanomedicine (2017) 12: 2293-306.
53. Begam H, Nandi SK, Chanda A and Kundu B.
Effect of bone morphogenetic protein on Zn-HAp
and Zn-HAp/collagen composite: A systematic Invivo study. Res Vet Sci. (2017) 115: 1-9.
54. Chou J, Hao J, Kuroda S, Bishop D, Ben-Nissan
B, Milthorpe B and Otsuka M. Bone regeneration
of rat tibial defect by zinc-tricalcium phosphate
(Zn-TCP) synthesized from porous Foraminifera
carbonate macrospheres. Mar. Drugs (2013) 11:
5148-58.
55. Kawamura H, Ito A, Muramatsu T, Miyakawa S,
Ochiai N and Tateishi T. Long-term implantation
of zinc-releasing calcium phosphate ceramics
in rabbit femora. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl.
Biomater. (2003) 65: 468-74.
56. Cui W, Sun G, Qu Y, Xiong Y, Sun T, Ji Y, Yang
L, Shao Z, Ma J, Zhang S and Guo X. Repair of
rat calvarial defects using Si-doped hydroxyapatite
scaffolds loaded with a bone morphogenetic
protein-2-related peptide. J. Orthop. Res. (2016)
34: 1874-82.
57. Ma Y, Li Y, Hao J, Ma B, Di T and Dong H.
Evaluation of the degradation, biocompatibility
and osteogenesis behavior of lithium-doped
calcium polyphosphate for bone tissue engineering.
Biomed. Mater. Eng. (2019) 30: 23-36.
58. Russo A, Bianchi M, Sartori M, Boi M, Giavaresi
G, Salter DM, Jelic M, Maltarello M, Ortolani A,
Sprio S, Fini M, Tampieri A and Marcacci M. Bone
regeneration in a rabbit critical femoral defect by
means of magnetic hydroxyapatite macroporous
scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. (2018) 106:
546-54.
59. De Santis R, Russo A, Gloria A, D’Amora U, Russo
T, Panseri S, Sandri M, Tampieri A, Marcacci M,
Dediu V, Wilde C and Ambrosio L. Towards the Design
of 3D Fiber-Deposited Poly( -caprolactone)/IronDoped Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Magnetic
Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. J. Biomed.
Nanotechnol. (2015) 11: 1236-46.
60. D’Mello S, Elangovan S, Hong L, Ross RD,
Sumner DR and Salem AK. Incorporation of copper
into chitosan scaffolds promotes bone regeneration
in rat calvarial defects. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B (
2015) 103: 1044-9.
61. Wei P, Yuan Z, Cai Q, Mao J and Yang X.
Bioresorbable Microspheres with Surface-Loaded
Nanosilver and Apatite as Dual-Functional 
117
Therapeutic metallic ions
Injectable Cell Carriers for Bone Regeneration.
Macromol. Rapid Comm. (2018) 39: e1800062.
62. Perez RA, Kim JH, Buitrago JO, Wall IB and
Kim HW. Novel therapeutic core-shell hydrogel
scaffolds with sequential delivery of cobalt and
bone morphogenetic protein-2 for synergistic bone
regeneration. Acta Biomater. (2015) 23: 295-308.
63. Gao C, Li C, Wang C, Qin Y, Wang Z, Yang F, Liu
H, Chang F and Wang J. Advances in the induction
of osteogenesis by zinc surface modification based
on titanium alloy substrates for medical implants.
J. Alloy Compd. (2017) 726: 1072-84.
64. Deng L, Deng Y and Xie K. AgNPs-decorated 3D
printed PEEK implant for infection control and
bone repair. Colloids surf. B Biomaterials. (2017)
160: 483-92.
65. Chou J, Hao J, Hatoyama H, Ben-Nissan B,
Milthorpe B and Otsuka M. Effect of biomimetic
zinc-containing tricalcium phosphate (Zn-TCP)
on the growth and osteogenic differentiation of
mesenchymal stem cells. J. Tissue Eng. Regen.
(2015) 9: 852-8.
66. Kargozar S, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Ai J, Mozafari M,
Brouki Milan P, Hamzehlou S, Barati M, Baino F, Hill
R, and Joghataei M. Strontium- and cobalt-substituted
bioactive glasses seeded with human umbilical cord
perivascular cells to promote bone regeneration via
enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic activities. Acta
Biomater. (2017) 58: 502-14.
67. Goodarzi H, Hashemi-Najafabadi S, Baheiraei N
and Bagheri F. Preparation and Characterization
of Nanocomposite Scaffolds (Collagen/beta-TCP/
SrO) for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Tissue Eng.
Regen. (2019) 16: 237-51.
68. Mao L, Xia L, Chang J, Liu J, Jiang L, Wu C
and Fang B. The synergistic effects of Sr and Si
bioactive ions on osteogenesis, osteoclastogenesis
and angiogenesis for osteoporotic bone
regeneration. Acta Biomater. (2017) 61: 217-32.
69. Grynpas MD, Hamilton E, Cheung R, Tsouderos
Y, Deloffre P, Hott M and Marie P. Strontium
increases vertebral bone volume in rats at a low
dose that does not induce detectable mineralization
defect. Bone (1996) 18: 253-9.
70. Walker J, Shadanbaz S, Woodfield TB, Staiger
MP and Dias GJ. Magnesium biomaterials for
orthopedic application: a review from a biological
perspective. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. (2014) 102:
1316-31.
71. Castiglioni S, Cazzaniga A, Albisetti W and Maier
JAM. Magnesium and osteoporosis: current state
of knowledge and future research directions.
Nutrients (2013) 5: 3022-33.
72. O’Neill E, Awale G, Daneshmandi L, Umerah O
and Lo KW. The roles of ions on bone regeneration.
Drug Discov. Today (2018) 23: 879-90.
73. Ma R, Lai Y-x, Li L, Tan H-l, Wang J-l, Li Y,
Tang T and Qin L. Bacterial inhibition potential
of 3D rapid-prototyped magnesium-based porous
composite scaffolds–an In-vitro efficacy study. Sci.
Rep. (2015) 5: 13775.
74. Chasapis CT, Loutsidou AC, Spiliopoulou CA and
Stefanidou ME. Zinc and human health: an update.
Arch. Toxicol. (2012) 86: 521-34.
75. Kwun IS, Cho YE, Lomeda RA, Shin HI, Choi JY,
Kang YH and Beattie J. Zinc deficiency suppresses
matrix mineralization and retards osteogenesis
transiently with catch-up possibly through Runx 2
modulation. Bone (2010) 46: 732-41.
76. Yamaguchi M and Weitzmann MN. Zinc
stimulates osteoblastogenesis and suppresses
osteoclastogenesis by antagonizing NF-kappaB
activation. Mol. Cell Biochem. (2011) 355: 179-86.
77. Xu Q, Zheng Z, Wang B, Mao H and Yan F. Zinc
ion coordinated poly (ionic liquid) antimicrobial
membranes for wound healing. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces (2017) 9: 14656-64.
78. Xu H-Y and Gu N. Magnetic responsive scaffolds
and magnetic fields in bone repair and regeneration.
Front. Mater. Sci. (2014) 8: 20-31.
79. Abedalwafa M, Wang F, Wang L and Li C.
Biodegradable poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL)
for tissue engineering applications: a review. Rev.
Adv. Mater. Sci. (2013) 34: 123-40.
80. Wei G and Ma PX. Structure and properties of
nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds
for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials (2004)
25: 4749-57.
81. Wang M. Composite scaffolds for bone tissue
engineering. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. (2006) 2:
80-4.
82. Mouriño V, Vidotto R, Cattalini JP and Boccaccini
AR. Enhancing biological activity of bioactive
glass scaffolds by inorganic ion delivery for bone
tissue engineering. Curr. Opin. Biomed. (2019) 10:
23-34.
83. Shanbhag S, Pandis N, Mustafa K, Nyengaard
JR and Stavropoulos A. Alveolar bone tissue
engineering in critical-size defects of experimental
animal models: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. (2017) 11: 2935-49.
84. Gu Z, Xie H, Li L, Zhang X, Liu F and Yu
X. Application of strontium-doped calcium
polyphosphate scaffold on angiogenesis for bone
tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med.
(2013) 24: 1251-60.
85. Li Y, Chen S-K, Li L, Qin L, Wang X-L and Lai
Y-X. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy 
118
Safiaghdam H et al. / IJPR (2019), 18 (Special Issue): 101-118
of bone substitute biomaterials. J. Orthop. Transl.
(2015) 3: 95-104.
86. Gomes PS and Fernandes MH. Rodent models in
bone-related research: the relevance of calvarial
defects in the assessment of bone regeneration
strategies. Lab Anim. (2011) 45: 14-24.
87. Stavropoulos A, Sculean A, Bosshardt DD, Buser
D and Klinge B. Pre-clinical In-vivo models for the
screening of bone biomaterials for oral/craniofacial
indications: focus on small-animal models.
Periodontol 2000. (2015) 68: 55-65.
88. Castaneda S, Largo R, Calvo E, RodriguezSalvanes F, Marcos ME, Diaz-Curiel M and
Herrero-Beaumont G. Bone mineral measurements
of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and
osteoporotic rabbits. Skeletal Radiol. (2006) 35:
34-41.
89. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E and
Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial
research in bone: a review. Eur. Cell Mater. (2007)
13: 1-10.
90. John Ł, Podgórska M, Nedelec J-M, CwynarZając Ł and Dzięgiel P. Strontium-doped organicinorganic hybrids towards three-dimensional
scaffolds for osteogenic cells. Mat. Sci. Eng.
C-Mater. (2016) 68: 117-27.
91. Spicer PP, Kretlow JD, Young S, Jansen JA, Kasper
FK and Mikos AG. Evaluation of bone regeneration
using the rat critical size calvarial defect. Nat.
(2012) 7: 1918-29.
92. Livingston T, Ducheyne P and Garino J. In-vivo
evaluation of a bioactive scaffold for bone tissue
engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. (2002) 62:
1-13.
93. Barbetta A, Bedini R, Pecci R and Dentini M. Role
of X-ray microtomography in tissue engineering.
Ann. Ist. Super Sanita. (2012) 48: 10-8.
94. Oledzka E, Sobczak M, Kolmas J and NaleczJawecki G. Selenium-substituted hydroxyapatite/
biodegradable polymer/pamidronate combined
scaffold for the therapy of bone tumour. Int. J. Mol.
(2015) 16: 22205-22.
95. Liu Y, Li T, Ma H, Zhai D, Deng C, Wang J, Zhuo
Sh, Chang J and Wu Ch. 3D-printed scaffolds with
bioactive elements-induced photothermal effect
for bone tumor therapy. Acta Biomater. (2018) 73:
531-46.
96. Diaz-Rodriguez P, Gomez-Amoza JL and Landin
M. The synergistic effect of VEGF and bimorphic
silicon carbides topography on In-vivo angiogenesis
and human bone marrow derived mesenchymal
stem cell differentiation. Biomed. Mater. (2015)
10: 045017.